"I'm doing everything right. So why doesn't it feel that way?"
Case Study / Equity Compensation
Two tech professionals. Two vesting schedules. Rising taxes, a house on the horizon, and no system tying any of it together.
Is this you?
Mark is 36. Senior Engineering Manager at a tech company, promoted eighteen months ago into a role that follows him home. Total comp around $340K — base plus RSUs. Priya is 35, a Senior Product Manager at a different company, similar range, with her own vesting schedule and an ESPP she’d been largely ignoring.
Together: a high-earning household, two separate equity plans, two sets of tax events, and no unified picture of any of it.
They’re renting. They want to buy. They want kids. The timeline on both is roughly two years. Mark’s company has been through two rounds of layoffs in eighteen months. He survived both. Priya’s company is quieter, but the industry doesn’t let you forget that nothing is permanent. That hum runs in the background of every financial decision they make — or don’t make.
Every quarter, shares hit the account. Mark’s, and now Priya’s too. Sometimes they sold. Sometimes a product launch was happening, or a sprint was closing, and they just didn’t get to it. The shares sat. The pile grew. The percentage of their net worth tied to a single company’s stock kept climbing. They knew it was too much. They just didn’t have the time or the framework to do anything about it. And every quarter that passed without a decision made the problem a little harder to solve.
Between the two of them: two old 401(k)s from previous jobs sitting in default funds, current 401(k)s parked in target-date funds built for someone decades closer to retirement, ESPPs they weren’t fully participating in because they already felt overexposed, life insurance through their employers that didn’t add up to what either of them would actually need, no estate plan, and a cash flow system that amounted to paying off the Amex and assuming things were fine
“We feel like we’re doing everything we’re supposed to do. We just don’t know if any of it is actually working together.”
None of it was a crisis, individually. Together, across two careers and two equity plans, it was quietly expensive.
GETTING EVERYTHING IN ONE PLACEFour things mattered most, and everything else built from there: minimize taxes, grow the taxable account for flexibility, build retirement savings the right way, and get ready for the next stage before it arrived.
Taxes came first. At their combined income, every dollar sheltered keeps working instead of disappearing in April. Both 401(k)s were maxed. Both enrolled in high-deductible health plans, so the HSA was maxed and invested — not spent at the pharmacy. On the RSUs, they finally had a plan in place before shares hit the account, for both schedules. Tax events stopped being surprises and started being scheduled. That alone was worth more than most people realize — not because the bill shrank overnight, but because it stopped arriving as a shock twice a year.
The ESPP question came up for both of them. Neither was fully participating because they already felt overexposed to their own companies. The answer was the same in both cases: the strategy was never to hold. Shares vest, you sell immediately, proceeds go into the diversified portfolio. What looks like adding concentration is actually a systematic way to convert a company benefit into diversified assets. Once they saw it that way, it was an easy decision.
Here’s where most high earners stay stuck. They know roughly what they should be doing. They just don’t have a system that makes it happen consistently. Every decision gets re-made from scratch, in the margins, under pressure, without the full picture. That’s not a knowledge gap. That’s a structure problem.
Three old 401(k)s from previous jobs were rolled into Rollover IRAs — better options, fewer logins, accounts managed with actual intention. Both current 401(k)s were rebuilt using low-cost index funds: domestic and international equity, no unnecessary bond drag, structured for the three-plus decades they actually have ahead of them. The difference between what they had and what they moved into sounds like a rounding error on a monthly statement. Compounded over 30 years on growing balances, it’s the kind of number that makes you wince.
The taxable account was restructured as a revocable trust — the paperwork that protects your kids and makes a future home purchase cleaner. Between two employer plans, they had life insurance that fell well short of what the other would actually need: for a mortgage, for years of income replacement, for the life they were building. Private term policies were locked in at their current ages and health. Disability gaps were identified and closed. Estate documents were started: wills, healthcare directives, powers of attorney. For tech employees specifically, beneficiary designations override whatever a will says — getting them right is part of the equity comp work, not separate from it.
Cash flow got a system. A simple flex-and-fixed framework, plus a quarterly balance sheet covering combined net worth, RSU concentration across both companies, both vesting schedules, estimated taxes, and house savings progress. Everything visible. Nothing invisible for more than ninety days.
BUILDING THE FOUNDATION12 Months Later
40% → 18%
Company stock concentration reduced
$200K+
Deployed with intention
Predictable
Tax bill — no more surprises
But the bigger shift was quieter than any of those numbers. The low-grade hum of I should figure this out — running in the background of two demanding careers — was gone. Not because everything was perfect. Because it was handled. Decisions were made once and kept working. They stopped having to re-decide the same things every quarter.
Maybe Priya steps back from product management when their kids are young — not because it’s traditional, but because it’s the right call for their family, and the money doesn’t make that decision for her.
Maybe they keep traveling after kids arrive because they built the flexibility to do it. Maybe Mark gets a layoff notice and instead of panic, there’s runway — time to find the right next thing without desperation driving the decision. Maybe Priya’s company goes through a rough quarter and she can make a move on her own terms. Or maybe they both stay the course, building steadily, without the financial noise running in the background of every Friday night.
They don’t know yet which version of the future they’re building toward. That’s fine. What they know is they’re building toward options. That’s the whole point.
WHAT THOSE OPTIONS MIGHT LOOK LIKEWHAT WE MEASURED
– Company stock concentration: 40% to 18% in year one
– $200K+ deployed with intention into a diversified portfolio
– Both 401(k)s rebuilt: expense ratio improvement applied to a 30-year horizon
– Both ESPPs enrolled
— discounts captured and converted to diversified assets each period
– HSA invested rather than spent: tax-free reserves compounding toward retirement healthcare costs
– Life insurance gaps closed: private 30-year term policies locked in at current ages and health
– Tax bill: from unpredictable to scheduled. No more April surprises.
WHAT WE MEASURED · WHAT WE CAN'TWHAT WE CAN’T MEASURE
– The Friday nights when the financial to-do list wasn’t running in the background
– The relief of seeing their full picture — two careers, two vesting schedules, one unified plan — for the first time
– The layoffs that may or may not come, and the runway that now exists if they do
– The conversation about what comes next that doesn’t have to start with “can we afford it?”
PRICELESS. Being present. At work. At home. On a Friday night with the person you’re building this life with.
FIRST 30 DAYS
WHAT THE FIRST 90 DAYS LOOKED LIKEMap the full picture across both careers: RSU vesting schedules, 401(k) holdings, old rollover accounts, insurance coverage, cash flow, and combined tax situation. Identify what’s urgent, what’s a gap, and what can wait. Get aligned on the shared goals: house, family, financial flexibility.
DAYS 30-60
Roll old 401(k)s into Rollover IRAs. Rebuild current 401(k)s into low-cost funds with no bond drag. Build RSU sell strategies for vesting schedules. Enroll both ESPPs and set up sell systems. Right-size the emergency fund. Set up the flex/fixed cash flow system and quarterly balance sheet.
DAYS 60-90
Lock in 30-year term life policies for both and address disability coverage gaps. Restructure the taxable account as a revocable trust. Max and invest the HSA. Everything core is running. Estate plan referral underway on a separate timeline.
Questions people in their situation are asking
-
The most common mistake is doing nothing — letting shares accumulate while the decision gets deferred. Whether to sell, hold, or diversify should be decided before vesting, not after. For most people with meaningful equity comp, a systematic sell strategy that reduces concentration over time is the right starting point. When two earners each have a vesting schedule, coordinating both matters even more.
-
There’s no universal rule, but when a single stock represents more than 10 to 15% of your investable net worth, concentration risk becomes real. At 40%, a bad earnings quarter can meaningfully set back years of careful saving. The goal isn’t to own zero. It’s to own an intentional amount — not an accidental one.
-
For most high earners with a spouse, a mortgage, or kids: no. Employer group coverage is typically one to two times your salary and isn’t portable. A private term policy locked in while you’re young and healthy is usually the right foundation — for both of you.
-
A Health Savings Account is the only account that’s triple tax-advantaged: contributions reduce your taxable income, growth is tax-free, and withdrawals for qualified medical expenses are tax-free. Most people spend it immediately. Invested and left to grow, it becomes one of the most valuable tax-free reserves in your plan.
-
Paid only by you: no commissions, no product revenue, no incentive to recommend anything except what’s best for your situation. The practical difference is coordination — tax planning, investment strategy, insurance, and cash flow all connected. When you have two careers with two equity plans, that coordination is what’s missing, and what most other models don’t provide.
-
Earlier than feels necessary. The mid-30s — when income is growing and life is getting more complex — is exactly the right window. The cost of waiting isn’t obvious today. It shows up later, in the decisions that were never made and the compounding that never started.
IF THIS SOUNDS FAMILIARCan someone just help me make sense of this?
For Illustrative Purposes Only. This case study is a composite illustration created for educational and marketing purposes. It does not represent the experience of any specific client. Names, demographics, and outcomes have been constructed to reflect realistic planning scenarios and do not correspond to any actual individual or household.
No Guarantee of Results. Financial planning outcomes depend on a wide range of personal, market, and economic factors. The results described are not guaranteed and may not be achievable for every client.
Not Legal, Tax, or Accounting Advice. The information presented is general in nature and is not intended to constitute legal, tax, or accounting advice. Consult qualified legal and tax professionals for guidance specific to your situation.
Registration and Regulatory Status. Dynamic Financial Planning is a registered investment adviser with the State of Arizona. Registration does not imply a certain level of skill or training.
Compensation Disclosure. Dynamic Financial Planning operates on a fee-only basis. The firm does not receive commissions, referral fees, or compensation from third parties. All fees are disclosed in the firm's Form ADV, available at adviserinfo.sec.gov.
Fictional Client Disclosure. Any quotes or statements attributed to clients are fictional and included for illustrative purposes only.